I am not familiar how the entire IKEA organization is structured but if you look at how its websites are built, it seems that its Hong Kong branch is not part of the group. Or maybe a forgotten part of the group. It is easy to tell from a mere visit to various other sites, and to Hong Kong’s.

IKEA United Arab Emirates

IKEA France

IKEA Sweden

IKEA Singapore
These pages are alike in layout and may have adopted a type of template to reuse, tweak and refine based on local preferences. For example, menus on US and Canadian sites are geared towards consumers while Singapore’s is more corporate. Nonetheless, these three share the same layout that is easy to navigate around.
The main point of this blog is not the difference in that IKEA Hong Kong has from other IKEA sites. It is the unavoidable comparison that makes IKEA Hong Kong website look really ugly.
- Animated text is so 1999. I can’t imagine a website still uses this old-fashioned design. Not that IKEA HK website hasn’t been updated for years; its footer shows it’s 2009 now. Unless it uses JavaScript to detect the current year and displays it. Animated GIF is excusable, animated text isn’t
- Paste-a-large-JPEG are ideal for lazy people. IKEA HK doesn’t seem to care about the real purpose of a website. Is it an extension of a newspaper page? Is it supposed to be just a brochure page that provides convenience to people who want to browse products?
- Search engines can’t see what’s an image is all about. As a corollary to the previous point, using large graphic in a page not only requires significant amount of time to load (for slower connections), but it also prevents search engines from crawling content embedded in the image. Heck, the text content in the graphic isn’t even legible enough.
- Signing up for updates looks like an exam paper to me. “Register to receive on our latest promotions” is attractive enough for someone looking for new arrivals, product features or bargain offers. However, following the link leads to an off-putting 15 sets of questions! Unless you will not send me updates on products meant for a thousand square feet household, when I fill up the form and tell you I live in a shoebox, that list is an awful lot of questions. Mind you, all fields are required
- Going back to homepage from inside pages can be a painful experience. Try going to the IKEA Services page and return to homepage without using your browser’s back button. Typically we see “Home” in the navigation window, but it’s not there. Typically we can click on the logo on the top left corner to go to the homepage, but it’s not a link. Good thing there’s a breadcrumb navigation that leads us back to the homepage. However, to those who are not used to this, a simple task can get complicated.
- Search engines can’t believe in “a picture paints a thousand words”. I just thought that since homepage navigation menu is so small, it has to be replicated in the middle of the page. For example, tips & ideas are both accessible in the menu and at center of the homepage, adorned with a blinking light bulb. IKEA often makes use of images to embed text content so that there very little amount of text that search engines can crawl.


All fields are required. You might qualify for a raffle draw when you complete the form.
Let’s illustrate a few personas who might end up going to the IKEA Hong Kong website:
- Newly-married couples. Needs to know what are new sofa models. Would find a website helpful if individual sofa models have easy to find catalog of products complete with description, measurements, price and stock availability.
- New parents with babies or growing up kids. They need information on child safety on newly-purchased children’s room accessories. They need safety tips and other useful information so they can sleep properly while children are on their own.
- Inexperienced buyers. IKEA prides itself as a company that encourages customers to assemble their furniture. That’s a good thing but not necessarily to everybody. There are those who want to do it on their own but want guidance. Sometimes paper manuals are even hard to follow. They need videos on unpacking and assembling their new possessions.
Are the necessary information being supplied by the current IKEA website? Let the people representing these personas answer the question. Or to expedite things up, IKEA can check on what might its customers and the general public to know more about IKEA. By doing so, IKEA can better connect to its customers and search engines by adding such content on the web. One of the ways this can be accomplished is by looking at the other IKEA websites as reference.
Maybe IKEA is just so accessible that a call or a visit is just more practical than surfing online. But let’s not forget its role; its web presence is supposed to complement — not replace — what already exists (posters, TV ads, email messages and in-store promotional materials). Providing more avenues to learn more about IKEA and its products could potentially translate to a windfall of customers.
The question on IKEA HK being truly a part of the rest of IKEAs in the world has already been answered. Yes it is. So I hope IKEA HK revamp this ugly website and think more about its customers before it comes up with designs.


July 8th, 2009 at 4:19 pm
From what I understand IKEA Hong Kong is a part of the Jardine group. They probably licensed the name and products similar in ways of franchising.
So no, IKEA HK is not the real IKEA.
July 8th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
From what I understand IKEA Hong Kong is a part of the Jardines Group. They probably licensed the name and products similar in ways of franchising.
So no, IKEA HK is probably not the real IKEA. (just like how Starbucks in HK is a joint venture between Maxim HK and Starbucks in the U.S. BTW, Maxim also belongs to Jardines as is 7-Eleven, Mannings, Wellcome, Pizza Hut, Hongkong Land, Mandarin Oriental, etc.)
July 9th, 2009 at 7:24 pm
Most companies localize their marketing efforts. What you see is a reflection of how IKEA wants to attract the people in your area. Not everything is vertical as you pointed out.
November 16th, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Thanks for the sharing. We were looking for this!
March 2nd, 2010 at 9:38 pm
What is real anymore? Calvin Klein is 100% licensed. So is Pierre Cardin. Most restaurant chains are franchised, even in the US. What is the boundary of real?
April 7th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
Even it is franchised, it should be part of the contract to ensure the website design and messages are aligned. One of the key thing I dislike about IKEA Hong Kong is that the website cannot really search any products. You can only read the "online catalog". I have switched to IKEA China website for years. IKEA China’s website is much better, aligned with Global design and is user friendly.
July 10th, 2010 at 2:33 pm
I’m a Canadian living and working in Hong Kong at the moment. I’m not sure what people mean by saying Hong Kong’s Ikea is not ‘real’. The only difference I see between the Ikeas in Ontario, Canada and the ones in Hong Kong is that the ones in Hong Kong are smaller by comparison (don’t have room for the warehouses like they do in Canada) but other than that everything is ‘the same’. What is real anymore? I just found out earlier (although a bit late) that Tommy Hilfiger is no longer owned by Hilfiger but was bought out by another corporation. So does that mean Tommy is no longer ‘Tommy’? Just like a lot of the European car companies went bankrupt and was bought out by other South Asian car companies so are they ‘fake’ now? This is hard to say what is real anymore these days…
July 28th, 2010 at 7:31 pm
I’m a Brit moving back to HK from Shanghai and was all geared up to order everything from IKEA online (as I hate walking around IKEA) so imagine how disappointed I was to find that their HK website is quite simply awful. The author is correct to raise the issues he has because this website is lacking almost everything one wants from such a website. Simply awful, no ability to search for products, no online shopping system and a terrible look and feel. I’m now hunting around for alternative suppliers of home furniture.